Getting a look at 's measurements for the first time, it is easy to see why he's such an imposing player at the junior level, given he already stands 6'11.25 in shoes with a 251-pound frame and a 7'2 wingspan at just 16 years of age. This setting has been a major learning experience for the young Georgian center as this is one of the first times he's been tested against the caliber of athletes he's gone up against here. He's struggled quite a bit with the physicality and experience of the older players, and has looked very frustrated at times, demonstrating some poor body language along the way. There is quite a bit to like about the high skill-level the Georgian center brings at this size, but he'll have to continue to sharpen his mental approach, improve significantly defensively, and find ways to fight through adversity when his offense isn't there. Bitadze was a force in the Serbian Junior League for Mega Bemax this season after averaging a double-double at the 2016 FIBA U18 Division B European Championship for Georgia last summer. Also seeing minutes in the Serbian First Division on loan with Smederevo amid standout showings at the adidas Next Generation Tournament, it has been an eventful year for the massive center. It will be interesting to see how he handles himself in a high pressure setting like this against far more experienced competition.
Bitadze has a very high skill-level for someone his size, regularly stepping outside and making 3-pointers, while also demonstrating an impressive feel as a passer and shot-blocker. A strong showing at the EuroCamp will be among both the most seasoned and highly regarded prospects at this year's camp.
After spending a number of years with Real Madrid's junior team, Yusta saw regular rotation minutes with Obradoiro in the ACB the past two seasons. Averaging 5 points and 2 rebounds per game this year, Yusta is a crafty slasher who needs to significantly improve as a jump shooter to take advantage of his fluidity and creativity off the dribble. Having a clear edge in terms of experience over most of the players here, scouts will be looking for Yusta to standout with his maturity, but he'll have to show better potential as a perimeter shooter to hold their interest heading into next season. Strengths -Very good size for a 17-year old center at 6'11, 250 pounds -Has a strong frame and what appears to be a solid wingspan -Mobile big man.
Can get up and down the floor. Not a stiff by any stretch -Very skilled for a big man his size -Knows how to operate with his back to the basket. Has footwork and touch he can rely on in the post.Has solid shooting mechanics and good touch facing the basket. Even shows range out to the 3-point line.
Career 25/73 for 3 in 37 games in the DX database.Above average basketball IQ. Solid passer.Solid rebounder Weaknesses -Body can improve. Not toned at the moment. Conditioning leaves something to be desired -Not very explosive vertically -Skilled, but not efficient inside the arc. Has shot a very poor percentage for his career from 2-point range (43.5% in 37 games). Doesn't finish that well through contact in traffic.Motor is inconsistent at this stage.
Doesn't bring the same intensity level to every possession -Looks lethargic at times defensively, especially when forced to step outside of the paint and move his feet on the pick and roll. Has average fundamentals on this end Outlook: Was by far the most productive big man at the camp, which was admittedly very weak in terms of pure size. Has been productive at the FIBA national team junior level with the Republic of Georgia at the U16 and U18 level in the B division. Elected to make the jump to Mega Leks last year, where he'll undoubtedly have a chance to develop both physically and skill-wise. May lack a degree of upside due to his average athleticism, but will be on the radar for a while thanks to his combination of size and skill.
Since the introduction and approval of the new Strata Title Act (Amendment) 2013, I had received many questions on when and how this amendment will affect the development and strata title application process. The amendment was approved back in late February and since then there are no official announcement on the implementation of the work flow and application process for strata title based on the new amendment.
Land office, JUPEM and MOH didn't give us a clear picture on the dateline for the new work flow to start, however I had heard some indication from certain quarters that the implementation will start early next year with the MOH will be giving roadshow in the second half of this year. I managed to get a draft copy of the new circular by JUPEM via google for the new Strata Title Act (Amendment) 2013.
Strata Foto 3d 4656486 J For Mac Free
This circular are quite comprehensive and most probably will replace the old Circular of 3/2006 for the strata title application. Now, I hope you can download this and study the entire circular and share with me your opinion and we can discuss further in this blog. Links to download via google drive:- Links to JUPEM website. Anonymous said. JUPEM requires XML files to be created and submitted for all strata submission. This is a waste of time and resources. Firstly, LS have to purchase the software to generate XML files.
This will take time to create the XML files. Upon submission JUPEM will only file it. Nobody will ever buy these XML files. Secondly, the XML file will be of no use to anyone. Why create something which nobody can use it?
Thirdly, the State JUPEM has no idea what it is all about. Fourthly, this is all unproductive work and will only slow down the strata preparation time. Fifthly, can somebody tell us whether they can make use of the XML files. Sixthly, there was a test done by JUPEM to create XML files for a low cost scheme in Ipoh, the XML files run into hundreds of pages. This is because every corner of the strata unit is provided with XY coordinates.
Is that necessary? The submission of XML files was implemented very much earlier and it was not practiced in every State. Leongdeikun said. Development of 3D cadastral involve a lot of resources (time and data) in order to generate an virtual 3D environment. Since our strata are not fully 3D it is sort of a 2.5D as the Z element are not always properly reflect the actual building as a common cross section to represent the building.
XML data for strata are a great start to migrate to a GML base, not just PHD thesis will require it. I always believe that the core vision of developing this XML database are noble but the execution and system are not properly think off hence the result are shabby. If a good system are adopted in the generation of XML data, it will be a great base for future 3D cadastral. Thanks for sharing your view anyway.